Dispute resolution

A dispute resolution lawyer to negotiate, mediate, arbitrate, or litigate with a clear strategy.

Cafore Abogados supports disputes between individuals, companies, partners, contracting parties, landlords, heirs, or business allies when the solution requires weighing cost, evidence, time, and room for agreement before escalating.

Conciliation Mediation Arbitration Commercial litigation Contracts Partners Agreements

A direct answer

What Cafore does in dispute resolution.

A dispute resolution attorney identifies the best path to resolve a conflict: negotiation, conciliation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation. At Cafore, the decision is made with evidence, cost, urgency, and bargaining power on the table.

Published legal commentary and media presence.

El Tiempo Week Portfolio Media | Cafore Abogados. Press articles, interviews and media coverage of our firm. Legal Sphere Infobae
Cafore Abogados S. A. S. Bogotá, Colombia Dispute resolution focused on strategy, evidence, and decision About Us Team
01Pinpoint the problemFacts, urgency, and objective. 02Review the foundationDocuments, evidence, and connected risks. 03Pinpoint the litigationProceedings, actions, offenses, or authorities. 04Resolve doubtsQuestions grouped by moment and decision.

When it makes sense

Consult when the conflict can still be resolved, but must also be prepared as if it could end before an arbitrator or judge.

An early review makes it possible to organize the facts, gauge the urgency, and avoid responses, signatures, or communications that could later weaken your legal position.

Common situation

Breached contract.

There are payments, deliveries, services, guarantees, or conditions that one party is not fulfilling.

Common situation

Escalating conflict.

Talks no longer work, but an immediate lawsuit may destroy value or close off a reasonable way out.

Common situation

Business dispute.

The conflict involves partners, clients, suppliers, assets, real estate, or sensitive business decisions.

Quick assessment

Choose the starting point. The response changes according to the risk, the evidence, and the deadline.

Negotiation: what to organize first.

There are payments, deliveries, services, guarantees, or conditions that one party is not fulfilling. The initial review makes it possible to separate urgency, evidence, and decision so that the next step is better supported.

Signs
  • Breached contract
  • Conciliation, mediation, and arbitration
  • Cash flow, business continuity, reputation, commercial relationship, and litigation costs
Documents
  • Contract, offers, purchase orders, or agreements
  • Invoices, payments, deliveries, and communications
  • Timeline of breaches and damages
Route
  • Prepare negotiating position
  • Initiate conciliation with supporting documents
  • Determine whether arbitration or litigation is appropriate

Documents, risks, and decisions

Risks, documents, and decisions worth organizing.

Each path links the main problem to the available evidence, the deadlines, and the consequences that may change the strategy.

01

Main risk

What typically prompts a dispute resolution consultation.

01
Conciliation, mediation, and arbitrationCentral aspect

Conciliation, mediation, and arbitration requires pinpointing facts, responsible parties, deadlines, and concrete consequences. In dispute resolution, that first reading determines whether it is best to prevent, negotiate, claim, or prepare a formal action.

  • Facts that must be confirmed.
  • Evidence available and missing.
  • Practical consequence of acting or waiting.
02
Contractual and commercial disputesRisk that changes the strategy

Contractual and commercial disputes require pinpointing facts, responsible parties, deadlines, and concrete consequences. In dispute resolution, that first reading determines whether it is best to prevent, negotiate, claim, or prepare a formal action.

  • Facts that must be confirmed.
  • Evidence available and missing.
  • Practical consequence of acting or waiting.
03
Disputes among partnersRisk that changes the strategy

Disputes between partners require pinpointing facts, responsible parties, deadlines, and concrete consequences. In dispute resolution, that first reading determines whether it is best to prevent, negotiate, claim, or prepare a formal action.

  • Facts that must be confirmed.
  • Evidence available and missing.
  • Practical consequence of acting or waiting.
04
Court litigation as a last resortRisk that changes the strategy

Court litigation as a last resort requires pinpointing facts, responsible parties, deadlines, and concrete consequences. In dispute resolution, that first reading determines whether it is best to prevent, negotiate, claim, or prepare a formal action.

  • Facts that must be confirmed.
  • Evidence available and missing.
  • Practical consequence of acting or waiting.
02

Evidence and documents

The documentary basis that allows decisions with less noise.

01
Contract, offers, purchase orders, or agreementsKey supporting document

Contract, offers, purchase orders, or agreements help reconstruct the timeline, confirm what can be proven, and detect gaps before responding, signing, or escalating the conflict.

  • Source document and date.
  • Connection to the fact to be proven.
  • A safe way to request, preserve, or supplement the supporting document.
02
Invoices, payments, deliveries, and communicationsDocument that organizes the evidence

Invoices, payments, deliveries, and communications help reconstruct the timeline, confirm what can be proven, and detect gaps before responding, signing, or escalating the conflict.

  • Source document and date.
  • Connection to the fact to be proven.
  • A safe way to request, preserve, or supplement the supporting document.
03
Timeline of breaches and damagesDocument that organizes the evidence

A timeline of breaches and damages helps reconstruct the chronology, confirm what can be proven, and detect gaps before responding, signing, or escalating the conflict.

  • Source document and date.
  • Connection to the fact to be proven.
  • A safe way to request, preserve, or supplement the supporting document.
04
Conciliation, arbitration, jurisdiction, or penalty clausesDocument that organizes the evidence

Conciliation, arbitration, jurisdiction, or penalty clauses help reconstruct the timeline, confirm what can be proven, and detect gaps before responding, signing, or escalating the conflict.

  • Source document and date.
  • Connection to the fact to be proven.
  • A safe way to request, preserve, or supplement the supporting document.
03

Course of action

Options to correct, negotiate, claim, defend, or sue.

01
Prepare negotiating positionPossible decision

Preparing a negotiating position is assessed according to urgency, available evidence, cost, counterparty, and expected legal effect. The right path is not always the most aggressive; it should be the most sustainable.

  • Deadline and authority or opposing party.
  • The risk of negotiating, responding, or suing.
  • The specific outcome being sought.
02
Initiate conciliation with supporting documentsA path that must be measured with care

Initiating conciliation with supporting documents is assessed according to urgency, available evidence, cost, counterparty, and expected legal effect. The right path is not always the most aggressive; it should be the most sustainable.

  • Deadline and authority or opposing party.
  • The risk of negotiating, responding, or suing.
  • The specific outcome being sought.
03
Determine whether arbitration or litigation is appropriateA path that must be measured with care

Determining whether arbitration or a lawsuit is appropriate is assessed according to urgency, available evidence, cost, counterparty, and expected legal effect. The right path is not always the most aggressive; it should be the most sustainable.

  • Deadline and authority or opposing party.
  • The risk of negotiating, responding, or suing.
  • The specific outcome being sought.
04
Preserve evidence before escalatingA path that must be measured with care

Preserving evidence before escalating is assessed according to urgency, available evidence, cost, counterparty, and expected legal effect. The right path is not always the most aggressive; it should be the most sustainable.

  • Deadline and authority or opposing party.
  • The risk of negotiating, responding, or suing.
  • The specific outcome being sought.
04

Connected risks

Matters from other practice areas that may change the strategy.

01
Cash flow, business continuity, reputation, commercial relationship, and litigation costsRelated risk

Cash flow, business continuity, reputation, commercial relationship, and litigation costs can change the main analysis because it connects dispute resolution with other legal, financial, family, business, or reputational risks.

  • Connected area and reason for the overlap.
  • Financial, operational or reputational impact.
  • Coordination needed before the next step.
02
Conciliation, mediation, and arbitrationA front that may broaden the case

Conciliation, mediation, and arbitration can change the main analysis because it connects dispute resolution with other legal, financial, family, business, or reputational risks.

  • Connected area and reason for the overlap.
  • Financial, operational or reputational impact.
  • Coordination needed before the next step.
03
Contractual and commercial disputesA front that may broaden the case

Contractual and commercial disputes can change the main analysis because it connects dispute resolution with other legal, financial, family, business, or reputational risks.

  • Connected area and reason for the overlap.
  • Financial, operational or reputational impact.
  • Coordination needed before the next step.
04
Contract, offers, purchase orders, or agreementsA front that may broaden the case

Contract, offers, purchase orders, or agreements can change the main analysis because it connects dispute resolution with other legal, financial, family, business, or reputational risks.

  • Connected area and reason for the overlap.
  • Financial, operational or reputational impact.
  • Coordination needed before the next step.

Litigation and disputes

Paths for litigation, negotiation, and dispute resolution.

A dispute does not always have to end in a lawsuit, but it does need a clear procedural strategy: what is claimed, what is proven, what is negotiated, and what risk is assumed.

Review a dispute

Common court proceedings

  • Procesos ejecutivos
  • Declaratory proceedings
  • Civil liability
  • Breach of contract
  • Recovery of damages
  • Interim measures
  • Appeals

Alternative dispute resolution

  • Pre-judicial conciliation
  • Mediación
  • Settlement
  • Domestic arbitration
  • Arbitration clause
  • Amicable settlement
  • Strategic negotiation

Corporate and contractual disputes

  • Disputes among partners
  • Commercial disputes
  • Supply contracts
  • Service agreements
  • Promises to sell and purchase agreements
  • Arrendamientos
  • Warranties

Evidence and case preparation

  • Evidentiary timeline
  • Emails and chats
  • Expert opinions
  • Assessment of damages
  • Prior demand letters
  • Evidence preservation
  • Hearing strategy

Decision point

If you already recognize the main risk, we can review documents and define the next move.

Talk to Cafore

Before you write to us

Five documents for a first review.

Not all of them are required, but they help orient the consultation from the outset.

0 of 5 ready

The Cafore Method

A clear process to move from the problem to a course of action.

The review is not limited to citing rules. It seeks to identify what can be proven, what must be corrected and which decision is best to carry out.

1

Context

We understand the decision, dispute or document that prompted the consultation.

2

Documents

We request only what is needed to assess the case and prioritize the documents that can change the strategy.

3

Map

We separate urgency, risk, possible correction, and the negotiation or litigation scenario.

4

Execution

We prepare documents, responses or actions according to the chosen path.

Possible deliverables

What can be ready after the review.

The outcome depends on the case, but the consultation should result in concrete deliverables, not a loose opinion.

Route

An opinion on the course of action and priorities.

A clear map of urgency, documents, risks and alternatives to decide with less noise.

Documents

Response, contract, minutes, appeal or supporting document.

The review may conclude in legal instruments ready for signing, filing, negotiation or proceedings.

Estrategia

Negotiation, defense or legal action.

If the matter has already escalated, we define the path to talk, respond, claim, or defend.

Scope of the service

Matters we review in dispute resolution.

These are the points that usually shape the strategy before responding, signing, negotiating, suing, or defending. The review starts from concrete facts and documents in order to choose a prudent path.

01

Situations we can review.

Common matters that are best read alongside documents, timelines, and real consequences.

Contractual disputes

Breaches, payments, terminations, warranties, penalties, ambiguous clauses and liabilities between the parties.

Negotiation and conciliation

Preparing your position, supporting evidence, settlement formula and limits before a hearing or sensitive conversation.

Civil or commercial litigation

Evidentiary strategy, interim measures, claims, defenses and the risks of escalating to litigation.

Arbitration and complex disputes

Business disputes, partners, high-value contracts and matters where the decision must be weighed against cost and time.

02

Documents worth preparing.

Not all are needed from day one, but they help organize the consultation.

  • Contract, annexes, amendments, invoices, minutes and communications.
  • Timeline of breaches, payments, deliveries or claims.
  • Evidence of damages, losses, warranties or settlement attempts.
  • Subpoenas, complaints, settlement attempts, or prior rulings.
03

Possible paths after the review.

The strategy depends on the evidence, deadline, opposing party, authority and objective.

  • Assess whether it is best to negotiate, settle, sue, or defend.
  • Prepare a clear position before sending demands.
  • Separate the main dispute from labor, corporate, tax, or reputational risks.
04

Frequently asked questions about this service.

Initial responses to understand scope, documents and possible paths.

01What is conciliation and when is it mandatory in Colombia?

Conciliation is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism in which the parties, with the help of a neutral third party called a conciliator, seek to reach an agreement that fully or partially ends their differences. It is governed by Law 640 of 2001 and, for conciliation in administrative litigation matters, by Law 1285 of 2009 and Decree 1716 of 2009.Conciliation is a prerequisite for filing suit in many areas: civil, commercial, family, labor (with exceptions) and administrative litigation. This means that, without having first exhausted conciliation, the judge may reject the complaint. There are exceptions (enforcement proceedings, matters of public order, conciliation rendered unviable by its overlap with a constitutional injunction (tutela), among others). The conciliation record carries the same res judicata effect and enforceability as a judgment.

02When is arbitration preferable over an ordinary judicial process?

Arbitration, governed by Law 1563 of 2012 (the Arbitration Statute), is a third-party adjudication mechanism in which the parties submit their dispute to the binding decision of one or more arbitrators. It is mainly advisable when: (i) the parties seek speed and predictability (arbitration proceedings usually last between six and eighteen months, versus ordinary proceedings that can take three to five years); (ii) the dispute calls for technical expertise that a generalist judge does not have; (iii) there is a relevant confidentiality component (commercial contracts, trade secrets); (iv) the contract has international elements.Its disadvantages are a cost significantly higher than court proceedings and the limited avenues for challenging the decision (the award). Arbitration requires a prior arbitration clause in the contract or a subsequent agreement between the parties. Not every matter is arbitrable: non-waivable public-order matters are excluded, such as certain highly personal family matters and individual labor matters.

03How much does arbitration cost in Colombia?

The cost of arbitration in Colombia depends on three components: (i) the fees of the arbitral tribunal, calculated according to the amount in dispute under the tables of the relevant Arbitration and Conciliation Center (mainly the chambers of commerce); (ii) the Center's administrative expenses; and (iii) the fees of the attorneys and experts.At the Bogotá Chamber of Commerce, for example, the tribunal's fees and administrative expenses are set by the amount of the claims, with tiered rates that increase with the sum involved. For mid-value disputes (between 500 and 2,000 monthly minimum wages, SMMLV), total costs can range between COP 30 and 80 million, not counting attorneys' fees. In international arbitration, costs are usually significantly higher. Before opting for arbitration, it is advisable to draw up a budget projection against the value of the matter.

04What is mediation and how does it differ from conciliation?

Mediation is a dispute resolution mechanism in which a neutral third party (the mediator) facilitates communication between the parties so that they themselves build the solution. It is voluntary, flexible and produces no imposed decisions.The main difference from conciliation lies in the third party's role and the legal effects of the agreement: the conciliator may propose settlement formulas, and the conciliation record carries res judicata effect and enforceability under Law 640 of 2001. The mediator, by contrast, does not propose solutions and limits their role to facilitating negotiation; the resulting agreement is contractual and must be formalized through other instruments (a settlement contract, a subsequent conciliation record) if it is to be given enforceable force. In commercial and family disputes, mediation has been gaining ground because it better preserves the relationships between the parties.

05Can I appeal an arbitral decision or award?

The arbitral award is the decision that ends the arbitration and, under Law 1563 of 2012, is not subject to an appeal in the strict sense. However, the law provides for the annulment action, filed before the relevant Superior Court of the Judicial District (or before the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court, in international arbitration).The grounds for annulment are exhaustively listed in article 41 of Law 1563, among them: the non-existence, invalidity or ineffectiveness of the arbitration agreement; improper constitution of the tribunal; failure to take decisive evidence; the award having ruled on matters that are not arbitrable or that were not submitted to arbitration; and serious violations of due process. Annulment does not allow review of the merits of the award, only the verification of formal or validity errors. The deadline to file it is thirty days from notice of the award or of the decision on its supplementation, correction or clarification.

06How long does an ordinary civil judicial proceeding take in Colombia?

The actual duration of an ordinary civil proceeding in Colombia depends on the court, the complexity of the matter, the parties' procedural conduct and the existence of incidental motions. Under the General Procedural Code (Law 1564 of 2012), in force since 2014, a first-instance civil proceeding should be resolved in roughly twelve months, and the second instance in six more, according to article 121.In practice, timelines are usually longer due to judicial backlog. Simple cases may close in one or two years, while complex matters can stretch to three or four years in the first instance alone. The Code introduced tools to speed up proceedings (concentrated hearings, rulings from the bench, oral procedure), but reality varies by city and district. Before filing suit, it is advisable to project realistic timelines and weigh alternatives such as conciliation or settlement.

07What is a tutela (constitutional injunction) and when can it be filed?

The constitutional injunction (acción de tutela) is a constitutional mechanism set out in article 86 of the Political Constitution and regulated by Decree 2591 of 1991. It allows any person to ask the courts for the immediate protection of their fundamental rights when these are violated or threatened by the action or omission of any public authority or, in certain cases, of private parties.It applies when: (i) a fundamental right is at stake (life, health, due process, vital minimum, equality, liberty, among others); (ii) no other suitable and effective judicial mechanism exists, or where one does exist, it is needed to avoid irreparable harm; (iii) it is filed within a reasonable period (case law requires promptness). The judge must decide within a maximum of ten days. If the injunction succeeds, the judge orders the measures needed to restore the right. The tutela has been fundamental in Colombia for guaranteeing access to health care, pensions, reinforced job security and due process, among many other rights.

08How is a conciliation agreement enforced if the other party defaults?

The conciliation record, under article 66 of Law 446 of 1998 and article 1 of Law 640 of 2001, carries res judicata effect and constitutes an enforceable instrument. This means that the obligations contained in the record can be collected directly through enforcement proceedings, without the need for a new declaratory proceeding to recognize the right.The enforcement proceeding is initiated before the competent judge (municipal or circuit civil judge depending on the amount, or family judge if the matter is family-related) by submitting the record together with the enforcement complaint. The judge issues a payment order and, if the debtor does not comply voluntarily, the attachment and sequestration of assets may be decreed to satisfy the obligation. A well-structured enforcement proceeding takes between six months and two years, depending on the court and the debtor's procedural conduct. For this reason, drafting the agreement carefully during conciliation is critical: ambiguous clauses make later enforcement harder.

09What does a dispute-resolution lawyer in Colombia do?

A dispute-resolution lawyer designs the strategy and represents the client in any mechanism —judicial or alternative— to resolve a conflict. At Cafore Abogados

10What is the difference between conciliation, arbitration, and mediation?

They are three Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms (MASC) regulated in Colombia. Conciliation, set forth in Law 640 of 2001, is an extrajudicial procedure and a prerequisite.

11When is arbitration preferable to an ordinary judicial process?

Arbitration is usually preferable when the contract includes an arbitration clause, when confidentiality is sought, when the matter is highly technical and specialized arbitrators are wanted,

12What types of commercial disputes does Cafore Abogados handle?

We handle contractual and commercial disputes in a broad sense: breach of supply, distribution, agency, service or construction contracts; disputes over insurance policies and claims; conflicts between partners and corporate disputes; unfair competition claims; property and in rem rights disputes; disputes in M&A transactions. We provide effective legal strategies to resolve conflicts related to contracts and business. Every case begins with a diagnosis of the claim, the available evidence and the best procedural route. Our team stands out for its relentless pursuit of favorable outcomes and the strategic defense of our clients' interests and rights.

13Why choose Cafore Abogados to resolve a dispute?

Cafore Abogados is a boutique firm with a 5-star Google rating from our clients' reviews. Our team of four lawyers, led by Dr. Fabio Castro Forero and made up of Valeria Canosa, Pablo Saavedra, and Catalina Estrada, holds a Professional Card issued by the Consejo Superior de la Judicatura — DEAJ. We work collaboratively with the client, providing clear guidance and solid representation throughout the entire process. We are based at the Edificio Excélsior, Cra. 7 # 12B - 65, Of. 401, in Bogotá, with nationwide coverage. The closeness of a boutique firm and the methodology of a large firm are the combination that sets our dispute-resolution practice apart.

Related reading

Useful readings before making a decision.

These guides expand on legal topics related to the service and help you prepare better for the consultation.

Conciliation table with attorneysConciliation

How to prepare for a conciliation hearing.

Which documents to bring and which mistakes to avoid so the hearing moves toward a real solution.

Read article
Editorial image of a guide on property restitutionCivil law

My tenant is not paying and refuses to vacate.

When to begin property restitution, which documents to prepare, and how to recover the asset.

Read article
Documentos legales con tableta, balanza y mazo judicialCommercial law

Commercial companies and contracts in Colombia.

How commercial companies are structured and what risks are worth reviewing before partnering or contracting.

Read article
Personas estrechando manos sobre una mesa con documentos legalesCorporate Law

Key aspects of corporate law in Bogotá.

A guide for companies that need to organize contracts, governance, risks and growth with legal support.

Read article
Grupo empresarial y abogados revisando contratosCorporate Law

Corporate law: an essential guide.

What a company should review when structuring entities, governance and disputes between partners.

Read article

Frequently asked questions

Real questions before consulting on dispute resolution.

The answers are general. The specific decision depends on the documents, evidence, timelines and circumstances of the case.

Before your consultation

When is it worth consulting on dispute resolution?+
It is worth consulting when the conflict can still be resolved, but you should also prepare as if it could end up before an arbitrator or judge. The first review keeps you from acting on impulse and lets you put documents, deadlines and risks in order.
Do I have to come with all the documents?+
No. It is better to come with what is available and a brief chronology. Afterward, whatever is needed is requested according to the route.
Does the consultation always end in a proceeding?+
No. Sometimes the best way out is to correct, negotiate or prepare a response. A proceeding is an option, not an automatic destination.
What makes an early review different?+
It makes it possible to preserve evidence, measure timelines and avoid communications or signatures that later weaken your position.

Evidence and supporting documents

What documents should I prepare?+
As a baseline: the contract, offers, purchase orders or agreements, invoices, payments, deliveries and communications, and a timeline of breaches and damages. If something is missing, it is identified without forcing risky reconstructions.
Do emails, chats or screenshots work?+
They can help, but they must be organized by date, author, context and connection to the fact you want to prove.
What happens if the other party has the documents?+
We review how to request them, what indirect evidence exists and whether it is advisable to use formal requests, conciliation, inspection or procedural measures.
Should I send communications before consulting?+
If there is an urgent deadline, it may be necessary. But in sensitive cases it is advisable to review the message before leaving a written version.

Course of action

How is the course of action decided?+
We review the facts, documents, urgency, cost, evidence and objective. In this area, routes tend to emerge such as preparing a negotiation position, activating conciliation with supporting evidence, and deciding whether arbitration or litigation is appropriate.
When is it advisable to negotiate?+
When there is a real margin for agreement, solid evidence and an outcome that is faster or less costly than litigation.
When is it advisable to escalate?+
When there is urgency, bad faith, a risk of losing evidence, deadlines running, or a refusal that no longer allows an informal solution.
Can I change strategy later?+
Yes. The strategy must be adjusted when new documents, responses from the other party or decisions by the authority emerge.

Costs, timelines and scope

How long does a first review take?+
It depends on the volume of documents and the urgency. The first conversation aims to define the scope and the relevant documents.
Does the advisory service include drafting documents?+
It may include them if the case requires it: notices, contracts, minutes, replies, appeals, lawsuits or agreements.
Can I consult even if I do not want to sue yet?+
Yes. In fact, many good outcomes begin before deciding whether to sue.
What if I want to study the topic before consulting?+
You may review the related readings to understand general concepts, but the specific decision must be made with the documents, deadlines and facts of the case.

Next step

Tell us what decision, dispute or document you need to review.

You don't have to arrive with everything organized. The first review serves to identify which documents matter and which legal path makes sense.

Schedule a consultation